“There will come a time when you believe everything is finished; that will be the beginning. ” – Louis L’Amour
“There will come a time when you believe everything is finished; that will be the beginning. ” – Louis L’Amour
A stunningly beautiful girl, Psyche, is born after two older sisters. People throughout the land worship her beauty so deeply that they forget about the goddess Venus. Venus becomes angry that her temples are falling to ruin, so she plots to ruin Psyche. She instructs her son, Cupid, to pierce the girl with an arrow and make her fall in love with the most vile, hideous man alive. But when Cupid sees Psyche in her radiant glory, he shoots himself with the arrow instead.
Meanwhile, Psyche and her family become worried that she will never find a husband, for although men admire her beauty, they always seem content to marry someone else. Psyche’s father prays to Apollo for help, and Apollo instructs her to go to the top of a hill, where she will marry not a man but a serpent. Psyche bravely follows the instructions and falls asleep on the hill. When she wakes up, she discovers a stunning mansion. Going inside, she relaxes and enjoys fine food and luxurious treatment. At night, in the dark, she meets and falls in love with her husband.
She lives happily with him, never seeing him, until one day he tells her that her sisters have been crying for her. She begs to see them, but her husband replies that it would not be wise to do so. Psyche insists that they visit, and when they do, they become extremely jealous of Psyche’s beautiful mansion and lush quarters. They deduce that Psyche has never seen her husband, and they convince her that she must sneak a look. Confused and conflicted, Psyche turns on a lamp one night as her husband lies next to her. When she sees the beautiful Cupid asleep on her bed, she weeps for her lack of faith. Cupid awakens and deserts her because Love cannot live where there is no trust. Cupid returns to his mother, Venus, who again decides to enact revenge on the beautiful girl. Psyche, meanwhile, journeys all over the land to find Cupid.
She decides to go to Venus herself in a plea for love and forgiveness, and when she finally sees Venus, the great goddess laughs aloud. Venus shows her a heap of seeds and tells her that she must sort them all in one night’s time if she wants to see Cupid again. This task is impossible for one person alone, but ants pity Psyche and sort the seeds for her. Shocked, Venus then orders Psyche to sleep on the cold ground and eat only a piece of bread for dinner. But Psyche survives the night easily. Finally, Venus commands her to retrieve a golden fleece from the river. She almost drowns herself in the river because of her sorrow, but a reed speaks to her and suggests that she collect the golden pieces of fleece from the thorny briar that catches it. Psyche follows these instructions and returns a sizable quantity to Venus. The amazed goddess, still at it, now orders Psyche to fill a flask from the mouth of the River Styx. When Psyche reaches the head of the river, she realizes that this task seems impossible because the rocks are so dangerous. This time, an eagle helps her and fills the flask. Venus still does not give in. She challenges Psyche to go into the underworld and have Persephone put some of her beauty in a box. Miraculously, Psyche succeeds. On her way toward giving the box to Venus, she becomes curious, opens the box, and instantly falls asleep.Meanwhile, Cupid looks for Psyche and finds her sleeping. He awakens her, puts the sleeping spell back in the box, and takes her to Zeus to request her immortality. Zeus grants the request and makes Psyche an immortal goddess. She and Cupid are married. (Summary taken from Gradesaver)
It is with much delight and gratitude that I write today’s post. Synesthesia has been a topic that has fascinated me for many years. (New to my site? You should view my previous posts: Synesthesia in Art & Fashion and Joan Mitchell) It’s a topic I’ve researched extensively. I was recently invited to share my research with Exchanges: The Warwick Research Journal, published by The University of Warwick.
My article, Teaching Synaesthesia as a Gateway to Creativity, is now live and available for download.
This article encapsulates my experience of teaching creativity within a higher education curriculum. Creativity often eludes common understanding because it involves using different conceptual streams of thought, often times developing unconsciously and manifesting in the prized “eureka” moment. In 2009, I began explaining the neurological condition of synaesthesia and later introduced this phenomenology in a course designed to cultivate creativity to first year fashion design students. There are many challenges in teaching creativity. Through teaching this course, I discovered that the first challenge is making the students conscious of their own qualitative beliefs on creativity and art. The second is creating exercises to challenge and alter these beliefs, thus forming a new way of thinking and experiencing the world. The most resistance from my students arose when experimenting with non-representational art. They did not have a conscious framework for making and evaluating abstract art. Introducing synaesthesia, a neurologically-based condition that “merges” two or more sensory pathways in the brain, gave my students a framework for discovery. Understanding sensory modalities and ways in which these modalities can blended together in synaesthesia proved to be a gateway to creativity in many of my students. The scope of this article chronicles how I developed my teaching methodology, the results it created in my classroom, as well as its effects on my own artistic practice. (To read the full article, please visit: Teaching Synaesthesia as a Gateway to Creativity)
Many thanks to Dr. Karen Simecek, Catherine Snyder, Neira Kapo, David Lautz, Terry Hall, Dawn Marie Forsyth, and to all of my former students. This article would not have been possible without your assistance, encouragement, inspiration, and dedication to the pursuit of creativity.
“Let me not to the marriage of true minds
Admit impediments. Love is not love
Which alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to remove:
O no! it is an ever-fixed mark
That looks on tempests and is never shaken.”
– Sonnet 116
The class met twice a week for a 3 hour time period. A short, bald, mischievous man greeted us with a big smile and a stack of papers. He explained that he would teach us how to see properly, and also how to improve our writing. We went through the syllabus, course materials, and expectations. I’d later understand how my calculated choice of class would changed my life.
Shedding these perceptions was really challenging. It was unlearning a subtle, habitual way of seeing the world. I’d continually make the same mistakes over and over again. He’d laugh at me while holding his suspenders and say “No! The face is the wrong size! How big do you think your face is?” I drew my perception of the size of my own face. He laughed again, handed me a marker. He instructed me to do the following: “Go into the bathroom and trace the outline of your face in the mirror. Then really look at it.” I did what he told me, and was surprised to see how small the outline was. At that moment, I understood the difference between seeing and perceiving.
That is when my work became really authentic. I would notice the interplay of shapes and void spaces. My mind began to develop a non-verbal language when I started to draw people. Instead of thinking in labels like “hair, nose, mouth”, I started to think in shapes, color, and the amount of negative spaces in between.
Neil also always played eclectic music from around the world. We started swapping music, and I have many CDs we exchanged from those classes. I noticed the effect that music had on my art. It became really clear that my best work would unfold as I listed to unrecognizable music – either a foreign language or something completely instrumental. I still like to create with instrumental or electronic music – anything that helps me enter the realm of non-verbal thinking.
I stopped making portraits – and all visual art – during a really difficult time of my life. During my senior year of college, my parents divorce. The events were really catastrophic, particularly because it involved illness and addiction. In what seemed the blink of an eye, I lost my home, my parents, and any shred of security. I pulled away from creating. I isolated from friends. I had to focus all of my energy on survival.
It took a long time for me to get back to making art. Writing became more of an outlet for me as my life began to sort itself out. As things improved and I felt more secure, I started to create again. First, I explored landscapes. Then abstract work. After my last series of paintings, I decided to enroll in a class at The Art Students League. (New to my site? You should read Ineffable: Fantasy & Reality, which describes my last series of paintings.)
I wasn’t sure what to expect. I just showed up with a large sketchbook and a box of pastels. Soon enough, I was able to access that non-verbal way of thinking. All those lessons from Neil were still fresh in my mind. Yet there was something additive to the works I am making now. The portraits I’ve been making in class now have more spontaneity. I feel free to scribble and suggest things like hair and shadows. I’m not so timid to use bold colors and wild gestures.
While I drawing, I’m very much in another realm of existence. It’s difficult to explain – maybe ineffable – but I become so enthralled in the act of creating that the work seems to flow out of me. It feels like I’m not drawing it, but that it is an expression of my reaction to the colors and shapes in the environment, and an almost involuntary movement of my hands. I’ll make 6 or 7 portraits a class. When I go home and review them alone, I’m fascinated by the results. It seems like I’m drawing moods, emotions, souls, and historical scenes rather than a model in Manhattan.
Fantasy and reality . . . are they really so different? Both are products of our own thinking, fears, and desire. The subtle difference boils down to audience. Reality is the act we play before our family, friends, and other people. Fantasy is the private movie that replays in the minds, shrouded in secrecy.
“Trust is the bridge from yesterday to tomorrow, built with planks of thanks.” ― Ann Voskamp
“What could – what should – be done with all the time that lies ahead of us, open and unshaped? Feather light in its freedom, and lead heavy in its uncertainty. Is it a wish, dreamlike and nostalgic, to stand once again at that point in life and be able to take a completely different direction, to the one that has made us who we are?” – Pascal Mercier
There is a great video that illustrates the difference between fantasy and historically accurate costuming. Character development in film and animation is largely controlled by garments. Illustrators and costumers are faced with a challenge of making the character believable and accurate, while still appealing to modern tastes and fashions. Reconciling historical and modern tastes can be a challenge. This is largely due to the fact that ideal beauty changes over the course of time. (New to my site? You should view my previous posts, Movies, Beauty, & Ideal Beauty and A Return to the Ideal.) The video shows Disney characters alongside with what their actual everyday garments would have been. I think each of these looks is great, although I prefer the historically correct versions better. Enjoy!