Monica D. Murgia

Where art, creativity, and fashion meet
December 4th, 2012

Dressing Room Confessions: Groceries or Courrèges?

Today was my day for running errands.  My career path has created an interesting schedule for me.  I don’t have a normal 9am-5pm, Monday-Friday type of work week.  Often, I have bizarre days off – like a Tuesday.  Teaching, freelancing, and writing have their perks in this way.  When I need to accomplish personal errands, I don’t have to fight big crowds that the weekends often bring.

The day started off innocently enough.  I worked on some projects from home while I had my morning coffee.  Then, I prepared my to-do list and left the house around 11am.  Tuesdays are usually for mundane activities.  Really!  I swear!  My to-do list was the following:
  • Drop some items off at a consignment store
  • Buy groceries
  • Post office
  • Write a post

The thing about consignment stores is that I always end up browsing the racks while waiting.  And then I saw this:

20121204-161537.jpg
Those bright orange vinyl bows caught my attention.  What a fun and interesting detail.  ”Well, it can’t hurt to look.  I am just going to wait anyway . . .” I thought to myself.   I went over to the rack and grabbed the hanger.  My inner dialog of “I really shouldn’t be spending money on clothes.  I need to buy groceries.  It’s such a bright orange hue, anyway  . . . I’m not sure if I could pull it off . . .” was immediately silenced when I saw the label.

 

 

20121204-134415.jpg

André Courrèges!  How did my day suddenly go from groceries to this? André Courrèges (b. 1923) is a French designer that contributed to the futuristic style of the late 1960s and early 1970s.

“Space age” designs were so iconic of this era.  America and Russia were literally racing each other to land on the moon. Satellites and other technology were being developed rapidly.  This shifted interest to the future.  Could we colonize other planets?  Would future generations live on space ships?  How would styles change due to this environmental change?

Designers like André Courrèges and Pierre Cardin tried to answer these questions in their clothing designs.  Space age clothing had the following characteristics:

  • use of hardware accessories
  • durable, industrial materials
  • androgynous, unisex styles

Courrèges first studied as an architect.  According to the Kyoto Costume Institute, he worked at Balenciaga before opening his own couture house in 1961.  His couture collections always challenged cultural rules about fashion.  For example, he was the first couture designer to present pants in a collection in 1963.  He also presented the mini skirt in 1965.  Courrèges went on to design ready-to-wear in the late 1960s.  This dress was from the ready-to-wear line.  I wanted to photograph it on my mannequin, but the dress was too small.  So I had to try it on.  (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

20121204-134427.jpg

The dress has some very minor flaws: the pull tab on the zipper is damaged, making it difficult to zip.  The vinyl bow on the right side is attached with hook and eyes that need to be reinforced.  All very easy to execute repairs.

20121204-134440.jpg

Judging by the length, I’d say the dress is from the very early 1970s.  Since the label has a style number 27051, I was able to discover some additional information.  Kerry Taylor Auctions sold the same style in black in 2009.  They dated the dress to circa 1970.

20121204-134447.jpg

I must confess, if asked to choose between groceries or Courrèges I would pick Courrèges every time.  But why choose when you can have both?

 

GHTime Code(s): nc 

July 31st, 2012

Circular Fashion

During the past few weeks, I’ve been working on another writing project.  I have to write a series of entries on American fashion in the 1940s.  Needless to say, I’ve been having a blast.  One thing I love about collaborating with others is that it exposes me to new things – new ways of thinking, different images, and endless possibilities.  This week marks my first deadline for the project.  And while I should just focus on completing my last article, I just couldn’t help but write this short post!

 

As I dug through primary sources (magazines and images of garments from the time period), I came across this evening dress by Cristobal Balenciaga.  The train of the dress, when held out, has a circular shape.

 

1971.79
Evening dress by Cristobal Balenciaga, c. 1967.  Image courtesy of Metmuseum.org

 

Balenciaga (1895-1972) was a famed Spanish designer during his heyday, and he caught my attention in graduate school.  I was mainly interested in him because of I was interested in exploring patriotism through fashion (an idea that merits another post).  Yet his precision and mathematical construction of clothing won me over far more than ideas of heritage through dress.
My first though when seeing the black dress above was “Pierre Cardin”.  Now, hear me out . . .
Balenciaga was influenced by religious garments.  While part of this fascination was due to Spain being a Catholic country, Balenciaga was also focused on reducing garments to their purest, most essential state.  This means reducing surface embellishments.  With this goal, construction becomes extremely important.  Many of Balenciaga’s designs are geometric, but still have a fluidity of movement.  This makes the wearer look like a moving sculpture – one that changes shape with every gesture.  Look at his famed wedding dress from 1967 for example:

 

211319
Wedding dress by Cristobal Balenciaga, 1967.  Image courtesy of Coletterie.
img-039

Wedding dress by Cristobal Balenciaga, 1967.  Image courtesy of http://www.tendances-de-mode.com

 

BalenciagaArchivesimages-060

 

Wedding dress by Cristobal Balenciaga, 1967.  Image courtesy of Art Lobster.

 

Balenciaga staple since the 1960s, the nun-esque statement is has been cropping up occasionally since this one from 1967article-0-12169813000005DC-331_468x537

 

 

Wedding dress by Cristobal Balenciaga, 1967.  Image courtesy of Little Augury
If you keep looking, you’ll notice the geometry in Balenciaga’s designs.  After I looked at an endless stream of images, I kept noticing circular elements to his designs:

 

fashion-graphics-2_1086881a
 Oyster coat by Cristobal Balenciaga, early 1960s.  Image courtesy of Soethby’s
CI56.60
Hat by Cristobal Balenciaga, c. 1955.  Image courtesy of Metmuseum.org

 

CIS:T.755-1972
Hat by Cristobal Balenciaga, c. 1960.  Image courtesy of  V&A Collections.

 

So why did I think Pierre Cardin?  In my mind, Cardin is the master of introducing geometric forms into fashion.  While he did so a bit later than Balenciaga, Cardin heavily used circular elements in his designs.

 

Pierre-Cardin
Pierre Cardin with some of his designs, c. 1969.  Image courtesy of angelasancartier.net

Cardin was interested in creating “space age” designs.  The use of hardware accessories and durable, industrial materials were characteristics of Cardin’s clothing.  He created designs for both men and women, each looking like an androgynous uniform ready for the space age.  Cardin himself spoke about his designs as futuristic:

The clothes that I prefer are those I invent for a life that doesn’t exist yet- the world of tomorrow.

 

Time is a cycle, anyway.  What better way to represent it in fashion that with the use of a circle?  Take a look:

pierre-cardin1

 

Dress by Pierre Cardin, c.1969.   Image courtesy of Mirelle

 

pierre cardin cape bullseye
Cape by Pierre Cardin.  Image courtesy of Christie’s.
02-2730263_0x420

 Dress by Pierre Cardin, c. 1969.  Image courtesy of Vogue.it

 

Either way, the similarities are clear to me.  If the above images aren’t enough to convince you, look at this ensemble by Cardin from 1970.  It’s eerily similar to Balenciaga’s wedding dress from 1967:

09-483307_0x420

 Dress and cape by Pierre Cardin, 1970.  Image courtesy of Vogue.it

 

Balenciaga staple since the 1960s, the nun-esque statement is has been cropping up occasionally since this one from 1967article-0-12169813000005DC-331_468x537
Wedding dress by Cristobal Balenciaga, 1967.  Image courtesy of Little Augury

 


 

GHTime Code(s): nc nc nc nc 

April 5th, 2010

Death-Defying Fashion: Pushing Daisies

If you could have a superpower, what would it be?  Pushing Daisies is a storybook fantasy about Ned, who as a child discovers he can touch dead things and bring them back to life.

Ned’s life is governed by three simple rules:  Touch a dead thing once, and it is revived to life! 

Touch a dead thing again, and it is dead forever.

Keep a dead thing alive for more than a minute, and something else, or someone else has to die.[1] Ned’s strange superpower caused him acute discomfort.  This discomfort is intensified when as an adult, Ned revives his childhood sweetheart, Charlotte Charles, also known as Chuck.  If Ned ever touches her again, she will go back to being dead – forever. 

Clearly the premise of Pushing Daisies is a whimsical fantasy but it is not only the plot that is fanciful.  The characters are more eccentric than the plot, each taking their expression of individuality to the extreme.

The ephemeral nature of life is a constant theme in Pushing Daisies.  The cyclical nature of life: birth, death, and rebirth are central to the plot and character development.  What is remarkable is that this is parallel to the cyclical nature of fashion.   In fact, the costumes developed by designer Robert Blackman evoke fashion, in particular retrospective fashion, as a visual medium support the premise of fantasy in the show and as a means to define each character.

Premiering in October of 2007, Pushing Daisies revolves around the adventures of Ned, owner of the Pie Hole restaurant and his business partner, Emerson Cod.  Emerson is a private investigator who learns of Ned’s amazing ability to revive the dead.   He proposes the two revive murder victims, question them about their untimely death in 60 seconds, and put them back to their eternal rest.  Emerson then has the information to solve the crime, and collect the reward money, which the two will split.  Their scheme goes along perfectly until reviving Chuck.  Ned cannot bear to touch her again.  The two rekindle their childhood romance.  Ned brings Chuck home to live with him, but they can never touch again.

Since Chuck has been reported dead and the means of her resurrection cannot be revealed, she must wear a disguise when leaving Ned’s apartment.  Her signature outside disguise is a chic trench coat with a scarf draped around head and sunglasses.  She usually pairs this look with a full-skirted dress, reminding one of the stylish Marilyn Monroe.  Each of the characters involved in the show exudes a particularly retro look.  Costume and set design become additional characters in this primetime series.  While Ned may have the power to revive the dead, it is the female characters who have the power to revive fashion.

At this point it is useful to define retro fashion and its significance in visual media. “Retro” styles borrow elements from earlier fashions but with a present day twist. According to theorist Elizabeth E. Gufey,

[R]etro is a powerful method of communication, it invokes a mix of complex emotions including nostalgia, that draws on a collective communal history.  Retro allows us to come to terms with the modern past.[2]

Retro fashions invoke a past that you may not have personally experienced, but is recognizable from visual media, especially photography, film, and television.

Already having experienced death, Chuck is determined to live her second life to the fullest, and this choice is reflected in her personal style.  By adopting retro, Chuck is allowed to view the present, and the future, with the eyes of the past.  Retro communicates an uncertainty about the future and a particular disillusionment with present day conditions.  Although the past is gone forever, the elements Chuck retains from the past console her and empower her in her second life.  She also has the prerogative to live life with such enthusiasm and an extraordinary intensity that adventure is always around the corner.

Chuck experiments with a variety of styles that ranges from the mid 1950s to late 1960s.  The earliest style she channels is reminiscent of Dior.  She appears in disguise with a magenta double-face wool crepe coat with a matching flower-printed silk scarf, green sunglasses, and demure white gloves. 

The flower printed silk is again used for her fitted dress.  The ensemble is reminiscent of Dior’s 1953 collection, in which he used many floral fabrics.

Another costume is a satin maroon pencil skirt, matching headband, short-sleeved white dress shirt paired with a golden oversized belt, and heels.  Here, Chuck resembles a vintage 1950s Barbie: curvaceous, yet thin, and cinched at the waist.

She next appears in a 1950s inspired pink full-skirted day dress with matching cardigan.  Her hair is gathered in a low, side ponytail with a bow.  Nat Kaplan created a similar silk satin dress in 1952, seen on the right.

As romantic as she is, Chuck does have a wild side.  Here, she is seen in a contrasted circle printed day dress with brown tights and red flats.  She wears this outfit while working at the Pie Hole, as it allows her to be both comfortable and stylish.  This costume draws on Op Art for its interesting use of color and geometric patterns.  The Op Art movement occurred during the 1960s and 1970s,  using geometric patters and colors to create the sense of movement in two dimensional art.  Here we see a work by Luis Molinari-Flores, an Ecuadorian artist that screen-printed “Circles” in 1963.  Flores was famous for his geometric abstractions and psychological use of color.

While Chuck definitely prefers dresses to pants, she does wear a yellow pant outfit in the Dummy episode.  Still, her costume retains feminine details, with a flounced embellished collar.  One may recall the effortless chic of the designs of Balenciaga.  Here we see a photo from the 15 March 1968 Vogue.  The ruffles around the collar and bright yellow are similar in both designs.  The Balenciaga outfit consists of both and skirt and pants and is more voluminous.  Blackman’s design is simplified, using more controlled flouncing and no overskirt.

Chuck’s two aunts, Lily and Vivian Charles, formerly a world-renowned synchronized swimming duo named the Darling Mermaid Darlings used to perform in elaborate costumes, complete with mermaid tails.  The two sisters are somewhat reclusive.  During several shows of Pushing Daisies, the sisters consider competing again.  In the Smell of Success episode, they don their Mermaid costumes and perform a routine

The costumes are playfully chinoiserie, complete with the pyramid-shaped straw hat.  Their overcoats are made from a traditional Chinese embroidered silk.

In costume, Lily and Vivian are similar to many of the eccentric, fanciful characters in the Cremaster Cycle of Matthew Barney.  A series of five films, The Cremaster Cycle is an aesthetically confined world that explores the process of creation.  Cremaster 1 has a group of chorus girls that perform a synchronized routine, wearing costumes similar to Lily and Vivian’s.  Sharing similar themes, both Pushing Daisies and The Cremaster Cycle utilize fantasy and costume as method to explore the meaning of life and death.

Lily’s distinguishing trademark is an eye patch over her right eye.  Lily actually has a collection of eye patches, each of which coordinates with a specific outfit.  Here we can see examples of three distinct eye patches.  It is particularly interesting to note the circular jeweled motif on two of these eye patches.  This arrangement simulates an eye.  It also is symbolic of Lily’s need to hide her emotions.  The patch is also reminiscent of sailors and pirates, figures also associated with water.

Another fictional character that is wore an eye patch is General Chang in Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.  While Blackman did not produce costumes for this specific movie, he did costume several episodes of Star Trek: Enterprise, Star Trek: Voyager, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, and Star Trek: The Next Generation.[3] Clearly, Blackman drew inspiration from the Star Trek series when costuming for Pushing Daisies, and Lily’s eye patch is the first piece of evidence.

Vivian prefers to dress in an exotic fashion.  Each of her costumes is a variation of chinoiserie, as previously mentioned regarding the mermaid costumes. Vivian’s favorite dress is the qi pao.  This style of dress gained popularity in China during the twentieth century.

Early into its introduction, the qi pao was considered extremely functional and provided women with a large range of movement.  Simple, it is a one-piece gown that closes with toggle buttons on the right shoulder.  Initially it was only worn by the wealthy, but became so fashionable by the 1920s and 1930s that the qi pao became identified as a national dress and a symbol of modernity.[1] The qi pao’s popularity in China peaked in the 1950s, but the Western world still has a level of fascination with this dress.

The World of Suzie Wong, which debuted in 1960, is exemplary of the Western world’s fascination with the eastern fashion and exoticism.  Vivian’s retro qi pao fashions evoke transformation, escapism, and the luxury of the exotic.

Another important character is Olive Snook.  She is a waitress at The Pie Hole, and also Ned’s neighbor.  She desperately loves Ned, but her feelings are unrequited.  Nonetheless, she is cheerful and this is reflected in her 1960s retro fashions.  Olive’s style is centered around two major fashion movements of this decade, particularly the “space-aged retro” that was iconic of the late part of the decade.

The context of Olive’s costume is primarily work related.  Often, she is in her Pie Hole uniform.  The uniform is very similar to the “space age” designs by Pierre Cardin during the late 1960s.  The use of hardware accessories and durable, industrial materials were characteristics of Cardin’s clothing.  He created designs for both men and women, each looking like an androgynous uniform ready for the space age.  Cardin himself spoke about his designs as futuristic:

The clothes that I prefer are those I invent for a life that doesn’t exist yet- the world of tomorrow.[2]

Olive’s uniform is simultaneously retro and futuristic, which poses the question every fashion historian considers:  how do we get back to the future?  The 1960s was the most modern period in fashion history, and designs have never been able to surpass its cutting edge futurism. The machine age dominated the view of the future, offering incredible technology fused with fantasy.  Therefore, a return to the 1960s is not nostalgic, but is a desire for tomorrow and beyond.

Pushing Daisies costume designer Robert Blackman is familiar with this concept.  In the early 1990s, he started designing costumes for Star Trek.  Accustomed to designs and imagery of the future, Blackman has an affinity with Cardin and the Space Age Sixties style.

However, Blackman’s range is not limited to the Sixties futurism and this is evident when Olive is at with friends or at home.  With friends, she wears a variety of ensembles that are Pucci inspired.  Here we see her in a pink psychedelic printed halter dress.  It bears a striking resemblance to many of the Pucci prints that are iconic of the Italian fashion house. 

At home, Olive is more romantic and vulnerable, her house decorated in French toile from floor to ceiling.  She wears floral pajamas when resting, thinking of how much she loves Ned.

Every episode introduces a guest character.  Costumes are very carefully designed to enhance their brief role. One example is Jeanine in the “Dummy” episode. Jeanine is a bulimic promotions model for the automobile company that produces a car named the Dandy Lion SX.  This car runs on dandy lion’s for fuel.

Here we see Jeanine in a white headdress that mimics the wispy dandelion seeds.  She also sports yellow petal eyelashes, similar to the pair seen here from a 1969 photograph in London.

Jeanine’s dress has a high neck, long sleeves, is cinched at the waist.  The hemline falls below the knee, drawing attention to her Courreges style white boots.  The back of the dress dips into a v-shape. As she is promoting a car from the future, her style reflexes the Space Age and Mod movements 1960s as well.

While the Youth Quake of the 1960s rejected couture, today’s culture idolizes it.  Haute couture has been a like phoenix, created, destroyed, and ultimately rising from its ashes.  Recent fashion critics question the survival of couture.  Stacy London, the TV stylist and co-star of What Not to Wear commented in April’s edition of W Magazine:

Television has democratized fashion,’ . . . ‘To not give couture its due is a shame.  But at the same time, how relevant is it in pop culture — particularly to the audiences who are watching these shows?

[3] I disagree with London.

Shows like Pushing Daisies expose viewers to what high fashion is all about.  Blackman’s costumes are custom made for each character, and communicate a distinct personality.  The originality of his costumes and unique color palette attract viewers.  Moreover, Pushing Daisies is a vehicle that is preserving the values of haute couture and fashion.  Blackman’s individual, personalized style is custom designed for each character from the ground up.  The only parallel to his costume design is haute couture.

In the same W article, Simon Doonan, creative director of Barneys New York defines, and defends, the continuing relevance of couture:

The value of the couture comes from the fact that it preserves the notion of craft in fashion. . .  It’s not the fact that it’s a bunch of rich ladies hurling money at the Paris collections.  And it’s not the fact that the misuse of the word is blurring the distinction between a dress from Strawberry that’s $19.99 and one that’s $40,000.  I don’t care about any of that.  Crafts are holy.  I feel exactly the same way about couture as I do about old hippies in Big Sur making tooled leather belts or American Indians making beautiful .blankets.  Exactly the same reverence should be attached to couture.  Not because it’s posh.  Not because it’s expensive.  But because it’s done by hand and it’s a dying art.”[4]

Through strategic theatricality and retro inspired fashion, Pushing Daisies brings back the notion of original fashion created through love.  Blackman utilizes fashion as the creative act of pure self-expression that develops each character – uniting them, their love for one another, their passions, their hobbies into a love that is greater than desire.  The complex and whimsical plot seems irrational at times, but it is love expressed through costume that unites these fanciful individuals.

These elements suggest that there is a higher realm of living, that death is not the finale.  Whether we look to the past or the future, our world is changing at a rapid pace.  How do we adapt?  What rules do we follow?  How will it all end?  With the changes of modern times and hyper-stimulation, fashion – and love – create their own unique set of rules that are not means to an end, but a progression and evolution aiming towards the sublime.    These rules defy death.


[1] Chic China, 157.

[2]Cardin, Pierre.  Past, Present, Future. 1990

[3] W.  April, 2008, 120.

[4] Ibid.


[1] Dummy Episode

[2] Retro.  9

[3] IMDB.com


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers