Monica D. Murgia

Where art, creativity, and fashion meet
January 24th, 2013

Utah Tailoring Mills & The New Look

20130123-225631.jpg

 

Yesterday, I was at the Baum School of Art working on my cataloging project.  I’ve photographed and created a numbering system for over 100 outfits in the Stieg Collection.  This is a really important part of creating a fashion archive.  As I was checking that each garment had the right number, I kept getting distracted by this suit:

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Jane Stieg had her wardrobe custom made by the Utah Tailoring Mills from 1958 – 1968.  But this suit reminded me so much of Christian Dior’s New Look collection!  In 1947, Dior really revolutionized fashion.  Wartime restrictions during WWII had limited the amount of fabric used in individual garments.  Money was also tight for many people, so they simply had to “make do” with what they had.  Women altered and repaired their garments.  Hemlines were higher than in the 1930s to conserve fabric.  So when Dior introduced longer hemlines and full skirts, it caused an uproar.  Women were literally forced to buy new garments to keep up with trends.  After all, you can always shorten a skirt.  But making it longer usually won’t work.

 

DiorVIII-The-Bar-suit---HC-SS1947---Photo-Demarchelier
Bar Suit by Christian Dior, 1947. Image courtesy of The Jewelry Editor
The Bar Suit, above, was probably the most iconic piece from Dior’s 1947 collection.  Sloped, padded shoulders descend to a small, nipped in waist.  The coat then becomes full again and covers the hips – almost like a peplum.  The full, shin-length skirt is in a dark, contrasting color.
Jane’s suit was most likely made in 1958 or 1959, because it follows the silhouette of the New Look must more loosely.  Dior’s suits required numerous underpinnings to give it that sharp, sleek, and impossibly small torso.  Throughout the 1950s, women went on serious diets to try to achieve this ideal body.  Garments during this period were very structured, and very tiny!
Jane’s suit isn’t as structured, and has softer shoulders, too. It also doesn’t have a collar.  Her jacket does have a similar length, like Dior’s.  And the color combination is a nod to the Bar Suit, for sure!
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

 

 The Met has a copy of the original Bar Suit in it’s collection (below).  They have great mannequins, and really emphasized what the outfit would have looked like on the body.  Jane’s suit (above) probably would have had a crinoline or tulle petticoat, which would have given it more shape.  The shot above is has no reinforcements, so it just hangs straight up and down.

 

h2_C.I.58.34.30_C.I.69.40
Bar Suit by Christian Dior, 1947. Image courtesy of The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

And like Dior, Jane’s suit was custom made just for her based off of her measurements.

GHTime Code(s): nc nc 

December 17th, 2012

Fabric Labels from The Stieg Collection

Labels provide a wealth of information about a garment.  They are the signature of a brand or designer.  They provide fiber content, instructions on how to care for the garment, the company of manufacture, and more.  These small little tags on the inside of garments also record information about the era in which they were made.  The Stieg Collection has some really interesting labels.

Aside from the beautiful “Custom Original – Utah Tailoring Mills” label in each of the garments, there are so many others.  Many of these labels tell the story of fabric.  Textile mills also used to produce their own labels, and provided them to designers and manufacturers to include in the finished garment.  Today, I wanted to take a closer look at a few from The Stieg Collection.

 

Alaskine by Staron.  Labels from The Stieg Collection.  Image courtesy of The Baum School of Art.
  • Staron – Alaskine: This was a new discovery for me.  There are several garments with this small, narrow label.  It’s a caramel color with black, bold capital letters  Each of the garments has a beautiful, reflective surface similar to shantung.  Shantung usually refers to silk fabric and has a shiny surface with uneven horizontal slubs in the yarns.  This fabric has a more regular surface than shantung, and kept it’s shape quite well.
Staron was a silk manufacturer in Saint Etienne, France.  It was started in 1867 by Pierre Staron, and started producing ribbons and trim.  In the 1920s, Staron produced a specialty jersey for Elsa Schiaparelli called Jerserelli.  Pierre Staron’s son, Henri, used ribbon manufacturing techniques to make beautiful silk fabrics.  Staron became a favorite of major couture houses including Dior, Balmain, and Balenciaga.

20659-staron-1947-tissus-couture-claude-bonin-hprints-com

Staron advertisement illustrated by Claude Bonin, 1947.  Image courtesy of HPrints

In 1956, Staron started to produce Alaskine.  It was formally trademarked in 1960.  Alaskine is a blend of (35%) silk and (65%) worsted wool.  It keeps it’s form and reflects light so elegantly.  Dior used Alaskin for it’s first trapeze dress, and the fabric became a staple for evening wear in the 1960s.

(To read more about Staron, please visit this link.)

 

 

45304_563244617023725_921533666_n

 

  • Onondaga: An old favorite silk manufacturer of mine!  The Onondaga Silk Company was founded in 1918, and began expanding almost immediately.  By 1933, it had acquired smaller mills in New Bedford, Syracuse, New York, and Easton, PA.  (To read more about the mill in Easton, please read my previous post)

The Onondaga Silk Company created stunning prints that were used by many fashionable couturiers and designers.  They produced a wide range of fabrics, including velvets, plain weave silks, jacquard, and eventually produced printed rayon.  They are most noted for the American Artist Series in the 1940s.

04167-onondaga-textiles-1947-silk-hprints-com
Onondaga Silk Company advertisement, 1948.  Image courtesy of HPrints.

 

Ultimately, the mill had difficulty competing with the quality and price of synthetic fabrics, like rayon.  It operated throughout the 1970s with difficulty.  The mill was closed in 1981.

As you can see from the image above, Onondaga produced beautiful, complexly woven fabrics.  (To read more about the American Artist Series, please visit this link)

 

photo(9)
  • Lesur:  The Pittsburgh Post Gazette declared Jacques Lesure the “world’s number 1 arbiter of woolen textile fashions” in 1953.  It was difficult for me to find much about the history of the mill, but Lesur produced sumptuous woolens.  In the same article, he was praised for “city tweeds” which were described as follows:
“We call them tweed because of their nubby texture, but the fascinating abstract patterns, the intricate cross weaves, and the subtle color mixtures are typically French.”
The image above is a great illustration of the quote.  You can see the texture in the fabric, and interesting color combinations.  Lesur made wool chiffon and other innovations with such a coarse fiber.  He later Introduced Orlon Sayelle, a combination of acrylic and wool that produced a lightweight fabric.
Lesur advertisement, 1949.  Image courtesy of HPrints
The labels for Lesur textiles are pretty swanky, too.  They have a small rendering of the firm and a serial number.
(To read more on Lesur, please visit this link and this link, too)
photo(7)

 

  • Pomezia Textiles was incorporated in the US in 1952 and dissolved in 1997.  The US branch operated out of New York City, and imported the woven cotton from Italy.  Again, this was a bit tricky to locate, but an article from a 1961 edition of the New York Herald Statesman describes the masterful weaving by the company:

“And the greatest joy of these costumes is in their absolutely wonderful summer fabrics: fabulous woven figured cottons, some in calico-like mosaic patterns; textures Pomezia cotton in shadow checks and overchecks that could pass for tweed.  Italian Pomezia in sharkskin weave, lushest in a black raspberry hue called rosee; even cotton jersey.”

The article is actually describing the designs of Sara Ripault for Herbert Sondheim.   A few of her designs are featured, but so much attention is paid to the fabric.  Her garments are praised as cosmopolitan in bright colored “tweed” that is actually cotton by Pomezia.

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

 

I have to agree, these cottons are nubby and wonderful.  It’s difficult to believe they are cotton – but they are.  Does anyone out there know more about Pomezia Cottons?  If so, please comment below!

To read more about Pomezia cotton, please visit this link.

All images of labels are courtesy of The Baum School of Art.

 

GHTime Code(s): nc nc 

March 20th, 2012

Great Coats

Great Coats: Women's Outerwear from the Collection. Image courtesy of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

Coats are often thought about in the dead of winter, but surely everyone still needs a cover during the crisp spring evenings.  Great Coats, a fashion exhibition at the Philadelphia Museum of Art gives some great ideas on how to transition your wardrobe from season to season.

Gallery at a Glance. Image courtesy of Philadelphia Museum of Art.

 

This lovely plaid coat is by Pauline Trigere.  But what I really love about it is that it’s reversible!  It’s always good to have multiple options.

 

Reversible Checked Coat, Fall/Winter 1972-73 by Pauline Trigere. Image courtesy of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

 

Yellow Mohair Coat, c. 1964 by Bonnie Cashin. Image courtesy of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

My pick for an spring evening coat would be this yellow Bonnie Cashin.  I’d pair it with jeans and moccasins.  The muted plaid with leather embellishments and fringe makes me think of throwing a party around a bonfire.

Blue Silk Faille Coat, c. 1948 by Christian Dior. Image courtesy of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

 

Evening coats always complete a party look.  Normally, Dior would be my pick.  But after having seen The Artist, I’m in LOVE with this 1920s silk velvet evening coat.  There are small beads that really catch the light and sparkle.

Silk velvet evening coat with metallic lame threads by ANART, Paris c. 1923-8. Image courtesy of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

 

Detail, silk velvet evening coat with metallic lame threads by ANART, Paris c. 1923-8. Image courtesy of the Philadelphia Museum of Art.

 

 

 

GHTime Code(s): nc 

November 13th, 2011

Antique Textile & Early Couture Up for Auction

Lot n° 171: Punjabi marriage shawl. Image courtesy of Thierrydemaigret.com

Lately, it seems like auction houses are taking cues from museums.  Christie’s will be auctioning off Elizabeth Taylor’s estate in December, but decided to do a traveling exhibition along with a $300 catalog.  For the vintage couture collector, I recommend paying a visit to Thierry De Maigret’s website.  On November 22nd, there will be an vintage textile & couture auction.  The offerings include: 300+ antique textiles, garments from the 18th and 19th century, and many 20th century ensembles from my favorite couturiers.

Lot n° 258: Cubist dress by Paul Poiret, c. 1924. Image courtesy of thierrydemaigret.com

The exhibition catalog is available for purchase, and is free online!  I’ve spent hours obsessing over my favorite pieces, also noting that the prices seem too good to be true!  Amazing vintage couture for around the same price as today’s high-end ready-to-wear?  It’s taking every bit of self restraint for me to NOT max out my credit card . . .

Lot n° 259: Cape by BABANI, c. 1924. Image courtesy of thierrydemaigret.com

Bids can be placed online if you aren’t in Paris for the auction.  I’d suggest making your holiday wish list now, because this auction is offering a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to amass your own couture heaven – or add the right new acquisition to your existing collection.

Lot n° 292: Bicolor evening gown by Madame Gres, 1946. Image courtesy of thierrydemaigret.com

This Madame Gres evening gown is well documented.  It was in Fémina Nov. 1947, p. 79.  It was also illustrated by Germaine Krebs in 1946.  This print is available on hprints.com – a must-have if you purchase the dress!!

Madame Gres gown, illustration by Germaine Krebs. Image courtesy of hprints.com

Another interesting piece, also by Madame Gres, is this Balinese dancer costume.  She made it for the dancer Muni in the 1943 ballet  La France d’Outre mer, by H.R Lenormand.  An image of the costume appeared in Marie-Claire’s 20 April 1943 article, le Mannequin dansant.

Lot n° 293 Madame GRES

These images are just some of my favorites.  View the catalog for yourself, and happy bidding!

 

Lot n° 234: Evening gown attributed to Worth, c. 1900. Image courtesy of thierrydemaigret.com

GHTime Code(s): nc nc nc 

October 25th, 2010

A return to the ideal

Fashion is directly correlated to the shape of the body.  In fact, clothing attempts to alter the shape of the body.  But what do we see when we look at clothing?  Are we seeing the clothing, the body, or a social construct of beauty of the time?

e·thos:

–noun 1. Sociology. the fundamental character or spirit of a culture; the underlying sentiment that informs the beliefs, customs, or practices of a group or society; dominant assumptions of a people or period.

When we look at clothes, we actually see the ethos of a culture or time period and what the ideal body of that culture or time is/was.  The term natural really has no place in fashion.

If you were to remove all the clothes, you will not find a ‘natural’ body but a body that is shaped by fashion: the body is no more ‘natural’ than the clothes it wears.  (Hollander)

If I had to summarize the ethos of the ideal body shape from 1995-2009, I’d have to say it’s “Pin-Thin and Pissed Off”.  (Thank you for such a concise philosophy, Rachel Zoe!)

For the first time in recorded history, visible bones and sagging flesh were the desired ideal bodies in the fashion world.  Philosopher Lars Svendsen discusses this unique ideal body in his book, Fashion: A Philosophy

One ideal of beauty that is quite unique to our age is visible bones.  A constant feature of all ideals of beauty until the First World War was that a beautiful body had to have enough fat and muscle for the skeleton to remain hidden beneath them.  Visible ribs and hips were ‘unnatural’ and ugly. (85)

But really, the idea of natural is dictated by the ethos of the time.  Some eras idealize the a body that is more realistic for women to achieve or maintain, but really the idea body is mainly out of reach for most.  (Hence the term ideal.)  Most models even fall short of this, that’s why Adobe invented Photoshop and plastic surgery is a booming industry.  According to Svendsen, a Pre-Modern society nature as the norm.  A Post-Modern society  individuals establish their own norms.  (80)

So let’s take a look at ethos through time and how the ideal body has changed.  (And I’ll take a gander at where it’s headed for the future!)

The Visitation (1506) Tempera on limewood, 139,5 x 94,7 cm Hungarian National Gallery, Budapest

The Visitation shoes the Late Gothic ideal body: small breasts, a round swollen belly, light skin and long lithe extremities.  Ethos: Fertile, and ready for maternal duties.

Anne of Denmark, 1605.
Mary Radclyffe, c. 1610

1600s: The early 1600s ideal body had changed.  A long, narrow torso was ideal, and held in place by a corset.  The length of the torso was emphasized by a stomacher – a triangular piece of fabric covering the torso.  You can clearly see this in Anne of Denmark’s portrait above.  Wide, rounded hips were also desirable.  This shape was kept in place by a farthingale.  (see below).  Large, standout collars were worn, drawing attention to the face.  Long sleeves terminate at the wrist.

Ethos: Wide hips are a great armrest.

Farthingale

Luise Ulrike of Prussia, Queen of Sweden, c.1744
The Two Cousins by Watteau, c. 1717.

1700s: Dress becomes somewhat less constricting.  The torso length is still elongated by the stomacher, but less so than the 1600s.  Hips continue to be accentuated, but become fuller and wider.  The emergence of the sac(que) gown occurs during this time.  The outter skirt is loose in the front and back, to allow easier walking.  It’s more formal version is known as the robe à la française. See the billowing fabric in The Two Cousins?  Petticoats and hoops made the skirts full.  Later, panniers were worn to give additional width to the hips.  Necklines were lower, and sometimes covered with light-weight cloth, called a fichu.  Fichu were typically made of fine linen, and sometimes lace.  Long sleeves are still common, but some forearm begins to be exposed.  (How racy!)

Ethos: Bigger, longer, fuller!

Dolley Madison, 1804.
Louis XIV

1800s: The French Revolution & The Reign of Terror (1789-1799) changed fashion drastically.
Paris secured it’s global dominance in the fashion arena under Louis XIV (1638-1715). Louis goal as king was to create a centralized state governed from the capital and to assert his absolute power. Feudalism had given power to local rulers, which diminished the king’s power.

Louis’ strategy was to invite the local rulers to live with him at his palace in Versaille. Once at Versaille, Louis (portrait at right) organized continuous banquets, parties, and social events, each of which had a lavish dress code . The nobility could never wear the same outfit twice. The local rulers would spend exorbitant amounts of money on new clothing, making them financially weak. They were also so absorbed on their social lives that their political power diminished.

This extravagance continued until the reign of Louis XVI (1754-1793). Queue the images from Marie Antoinette by Sofia Coppola. Marie Antoinette, Louis XVI’s wife, became the target of the French revolutionaries.  Anyone wearing extravagant garments became a target, ensuring a trip to the guillotine.  The French Revolution made dressing down, or “undress” very fashionable.  (And for reasons other than looking stylish.)

The court had become completely self-obsessed with displays of conspicuous consumption. So self-obsessed that they ignored that France was in an enormous financial crisis and was nearly bankrupt. (Sound familiar?)

Marie Antoinette

Marie Antoinette had started a small movement amongst her closest friends of dressing very simply. She would often wear simple white muslin dresses, and even wore it for a public portrait. The portrait was met with criticism, as the dress was very similar to undergarments of the day and thought to be improper for the queen.

A series of riots occurred, and the monarchy was overthrown. Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette were executed at the guillotine, which marked the beginning of the Reign of Terror. Anyone who appeared to support the monarchy, by action, dress, or relationships, were sent to the guillotine. Women adopted simple fashion to avoid death. Ironically, most women dressed in white muslin dresses like the one Marie Antoinette’s (left) had received criticism for.

Dancing Dress, 1809

Undergarments are considerably less restrictive. The chemise, a loose linen “slip” worn to protect the outer garments from persperation, continue to be worn.  The corset is short, and looks like a proto-bra.  Shorter sleeves are now in fashion.  The look is usually pared with gloves, like this dancing gown from 1809.  Ethos? Shabby Chic.

Corset and chemise, c. 1811

1830s-1860s: Puff sleeves expose the arms in their full glory.  Necklines also begin to expose the neck and shoulder, emphasising delicate areas as well as the decolletage. The skirt becomes full again, mostly with starched petticoats, but crinolines become popular with advances in technology c. 1850.  Skirts get wider and wider, to almost ridiculous ends. Critics ridicule the woman wearing the massive crinolines, noting how they make normal tasks like walking and shaking hands very challenging.  Ethos: Looking good is more important that being mobile.

Crinoline
Queen Victoria, 1841.
Crinolines make for difficult introductions

1870s-1880s:  My personal favorite!  The bustle becomes the latest style.  All of the fullness that was present in the skirt is pushed in the back, accentuating the derriere. The overskirts were elaborate with lots of trim, flounces, ribbons, and pleats.  The corset became very structured, and making the torso take an S shape (cuirass corsets).  Day dresses have sleeves, evening dresses have either short or no sleeves.  Off-the-shoulder gowns with a low neckline were very common.  The overall silhouette is very form fitting.  Ethos: Baby got back!

Woman in Blue, by Corot 1874.

Love Letter by Toulmouche, 1883

1890s: Women take to a more active lifestyle, and abandon the extreme ornamentation of previous decades.  Corsets are still severe, but women are becoming more active.

Mr. & Mrs. Phelps by Sargent, 1897


Bicycling, tennis, swimming, horseback riding – woman wanted to do it all.    The skirts were a-line, allowing the legs to have a greater range of movement than in long, bustled skirts.  Leg-of-mutton sleeves become popular.  Even non-athletic women are interested in the new sportswear.  The engraving below shows two woman talking about bicycle suits.  The original caption reads:

Gertrude: Dear Jessie, what on EARTH is that bicycle suit for?

Jessie: Why to wear, of course!

Gertrude: But you haven’t got a bicycle!

Jessie: No, but I’ve got a sewing machine!

Ethos: Anything men can do, woman can do more stylishly!

Bicycle Babes, 1895.
Bathing suits, 1898.

1900-1919:  Narrow skirts, high waistlines, and low necklines are the rage.  Styles tend to be off the shoulder for evening, worn with long gloves.  The Gibson Girl look is very popular, best illustrated by the portrait of Elizabeth Wharton Drexel, below:

Elizabeth Wharton Drexel, 1905

Paul Poiret begins to make radially new fashion – innovation in fashion design.  His hallmarks are the harem look, the hobble skirt, and the lampshade tunic.  Ethos: Romantically exotic.

Poiret Design, 1914
Harem look
Hobble

1920s: Yes, the era of the flapper and beginning of Chanel’s empire.  Taboos are thrown out the window: women cut their hair short, wear short skirts, and abandon the corsets.  Caminols and lightweight bralettes were worn instead of the restrictive corsets.  Really daring women even wore pants.  The ideal body was very boyish – small breasts, no hips, short hair. Chanel was a great pioneer of sportswear, and used lots of jersey in her designs.  (I’ll talk more about her in a future blog post.)  Ethos: Burn your bra (and corset)!

Young Woman, 1925. (Doesn’t she look like she’s on a cell phone?)
Early Chanel
Chanel Sportswear

1930s: Women return to a more glamorous style.  The unrestricted female form is shown, without smashing the breasts down.  Longer skirts were worn: daytime lengths were mid calf, evening were floor length.  Nylon and the zipper are used in the mass market.  Since women are becoming more active, there is a bigger distinction between daytime and evening wear.   Ethos: Liberation is great, but glamor is better!

Working Women, c. 1936
1930s Glamor

1940s: World War II reduced high fashion down to a trickle.  America was shut off from Paris, making manufacturers higher American designers.  There were several years of altering old clothing.  Then it came.  The New Look.  Dior changes the length of the skirt, starting a fashion revolution. (Mainly because women couldn’t alter their skirts to get the new length, causing them to have to buy a new wardrobe!)   The small waist was idea, and jacked included boning and light corset structure to achieve that architectural look.  Ethos: Time for a shopping spree . . .

Dior’s New Look

1950s: The glamor continues.  Silhouettes are generally within the following types: A-line, Trapeze, The Sac, & the Empire Line.  The hourglass figure is the ideal, with emphasis on a very small waist.  Ethos: Womanly and elegant, but idealized by clothing.

Trapeze Jacket
Fab 50s
Balenciaga

1960s:  The decade started out demure, with the ideal of Mad Men and Jackie Kennedy, but ended up with a youthquake!  Mini-skirts, colorful prints, and experimental fashion were prevalent.  Unusual materials, like paper were used – stressing the ephemeral nature of fashion.  Super thin model Twiggy becomes famous, ushering in thin as the ideal Ethos: Thin is in.

Biba
Paper Dresses, Warhol
Twiggy

1970s: Characterized by anti-fashion.  Androgyny is common (not being able to tell if it’s a man or woman).  Leisure suits are huge, and Hippies are everywhere.  Ethos: Is that a man or a woman?

Leisure, all the way. 1972
All I can say is, WOW…

The late 1980s and beginning of the 1990s had been the period of the Glamazons: Christie Brinkley, Elle Macpherson, Cindy Crawford, Christy Turlington (my favorite!), Linda Evangelista, Claudia Schiffer, Naomi Campbell, and Laetitia Casta.

Christie Brinkley
Linda Evangelista

Christy Turlington
Naomi Campbell
Laetitia Casta

The Big Six were: Claudia Schiffer, Cindy Crawford, Kate Moss, Linda Evangelista, Naomi Campbell and Christy Turlington.  The ideal body is very feminine, curvy, yet fit.  Definitely a more sensual idea, and more attainable than the 60s focus on Twiggy.  Ethos: Curves for miles.

Late 90s: Ushered in “heroine chic” and the use of painfully thin models.  The most notable was Calvin Klein’s choice of Kate Moss, who at one point weighed around 95 lbs.  Ethos: Pin thin and pissed off.

A Very Thin Kate Moss

Kate, take 2

Feed her, quick!

Recently, a more realistic ideal body has been taking the fashion world.  Similar to the early 90s, a curvier, more feminine body is becoming accepted.  This month’s Harper’s Bazaar featured an article on Christina Hendricks, from Mad Men.  The article compares her to Marilyn Monroe, stating that her sexy curves and stunning self-confidence made her a star.

Christina Henricks

Mad Men’s Christina Hendricks

Other stars pioneering the more realistic ideal body are Kim Kardashian and Crystal Renn

Kim
Crystal Renn
Crystal Renn

By the looks of the runways, it seems fashion is headed for a return to the ideal.  Stay tuned . . .

Oh, yeah.  Ethos: Embrace your curves!

GHTime Code(s): nc nc nc nc nc 

April 5th, 2010

Death-Defying Fashion: Pushing Daisies

If you could have a superpower, what would it be?  Pushing Daisies is a storybook fantasy about Ned, who as a child discovers he can touch dead things and bring them back to life.

Ned’s life is governed by three simple rules:  Touch a dead thing once, and it is revived to life! 

Touch a dead thing again, and it is dead forever.

Keep a dead thing alive for more than a minute, and something else, or someone else has to die.[1] Ned’s strange superpower caused him acute discomfort.  This discomfort is intensified when as an adult, Ned revives his childhood sweetheart, Charlotte Charles, also known as Chuck.  If Ned ever touches her again, she will go back to being dead – forever. 

Clearly the premise of Pushing Daisies is a whimsical fantasy but it is not only the plot that is fanciful.  The characters are more eccentric than the plot, each taking their expression of individuality to the extreme.

The ephemeral nature of life is a constant theme in Pushing Daisies.  The cyclical nature of life: birth, death, and rebirth are central to the plot and character development.  What is remarkable is that this is parallel to the cyclical nature of fashion.   In fact, the costumes developed by designer Robert Blackman evoke fashion, in particular retrospective fashion, as a visual medium support the premise of fantasy in the show and as a means to define each character.

Premiering in October of 2007, Pushing Daisies revolves around the adventures of Ned, owner of the Pie Hole restaurant and his business partner, Emerson Cod.  Emerson is a private investigator who learns of Ned’s amazing ability to revive the dead.   He proposes the two revive murder victims, question them about their untimely death in 60 seconds, and put them back to their eternal rest.  Emerson then has the information to solve the crime, and collect the reward money, which the two will split.  Their scheme goes along perfectly until reviving Chuck.  Ned cannot bear to touch her again.  The two rekindle their childhood romance.  Ned brings Chuck home to live with him, but they can never touch again.

Since Chuck has been reported dead and the means of her resurrection cannot be revealed, she must wear a disguise when leaving Ned’s apartment.  Her signature outside disguise is a chic trench coat with a scarf draped around head and sunglasses.  She usually pairs this look with a full-skirted dress, reminding one of the stylish Marilyn Monroe.  Each of the characters involved in the show exudes a particularly retro look.  Costume and set design become additional characters in this primetime series.  While Ned may have the power to revive the dead, it is the female characters who have the power to revive fashion.

At this point it is useful to define retro fashion and its significance in visual media. “Retro” styles borrow elements from earlier fashions but with a present day twist. According to theorist Elizabeth E. Gufey,

[R]etro is a powerful method of communication, it invokes a mix of complex emotions including nostalgia, that draws on a collective communal history.  Retro allows us to come to terms with the modern past.[2]

Retro fashions invoke a past that you may not have personally experienced, but is recognizable from visual media, especially photography, film, and television.

Already having experienced death, Chuck is determined to live her second life to the fullest, and this choice is reflected in her personal style.  By adopting retro, Chuck is allowed to view the present, and the future, with the eyes of the past.  Retro communicates an uncertainty about the future and a particular disillusionment with present day conditions.  Although the past is gone forever, the elements Chuck retains from the past console her and empower her in her second life.  She also has the prerogative to live life with such enthusiasm and an extraordinary intensity that adventure is always around the corner.

Chuck experiments with a variety of styles that ranges from the mid 1950s to late 1960s.  The earliest style she channels is reminiscent of Dior.  She appears in disguise with a magenta double-face wool crepe coat with a matching flower-printed silk scarf, green sunglasses, and demure white gloves. 

The flower printed silk is again used for her fitted dress.  The ensemble is reminiscent of Dior’s 1953 collection, in which he used many floral fabrics.

Another costume is a satin maroon pencil skirt, matching headband, short-sleeved white dress shirt paired with a golden oversized belt, and heels.  Here, Chuck resembles a vintage 1950s Barbie: curvaceous, yet thin, and cinched at the waist.

She next appears in a 1950s inspired pink full-skirted day dress with matching cardigan.  Her hair is gathered in a low, side ponytail with a bow.  Nat Kaplan created a similar silk satin dress in 1952, seen on the right.

As romantic as she is, Chuck does have a wild side.  Here, she is seen in a contrasted circle printed day dress with brown tights and red flats.  She wears this outfit while working at the Pie Hole, as it allows her to be both comfortable and stylish.  This costume draws on Op Art for its interesting use of color and geometric patterns.  The Op Art movement occurred during the 1960s and 1970s,  using geometric patters and colors to create the sense of movement in two dimensional art.  Here we see a work by Luis Molinari-Flores, an Ecuadorian artist that screen-printed “Circles” in 1963.  Flores was famous for his geometric abstractions and psychological use of color.

While Chuck definitely prefers dresses to pants, she does wear a yellow pant outfit in the Dummy episode.  Still, her costume retains feminine details, with a flounced embellished collar.  One may recall the effortless chic of the designs of Balenciaga.  Here we see a photo from the 15 March 1968 Vogue.  The ruffles around the collar and bright yellow are similar in both designs.  The Balenciaga outfit consists of both and skirt and pants and is more voluminous.  Blackman’s design is simplified, using more controlled flouncing and no overskirt.

Chuck’s two aunts, Lily and Vivian Charles, formerly a world-renowned synchronized swimming duo named the Darling Mermaid Darlings used to perform in elaborate costumes, complete with mermaid tails.  The two sisters are somewhat reclusive.  During several shows of Pushing Daisies, the sisters consider competing again.  In the Smell of Success episode, they don their Mermaid costumes and perform a routine

The costumes are playfully chinoiserie, complete with the pyramid-shaped straw hat.  Their overcoats are made from a traditional Chinese embroidered silk.

In costume, Lily and Vivian are similar to many of the eccentric, fanciful characters in the Cremaster Cycle of Matthew Barney.  A series of five films, The Cremaster Cycle is an aesthetically confined world that explores the process of creation.  Cremaster 1 has a group of chorus girls that perform a synchronized routine, wearing costumes similar to Lily and Vivian’s.  Sharing similar themes, both Pushing Daisies and The Cremaster Cycle utilize fantasy and costume as method to explore the meaning of life and death.

Lily’s distinguishing trademark is an eye patch over her right eye.  Lily actually has a collection of eye patches, each of which coordinates with a specific outfit.  Here we can see examples of three distinct eye patches.  It is particularly interesting to note the circular jeweled motif on two of these eye patches.  This arrangement simulates an eye.  It also is symbolic of Lily’s need to hide her emotions.  The patch is also reminiscent of sailors and pirates, figures also associated with water.

Another fictional character that is wore an eye patch is General Chang in Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.  While Blackman did not produce costumes for this specific movie, he did costume several episodes of Star Trek: Enterprise, Star Trek: Voyager, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, and Star Trek: The Next Generation.[3] Clearly, Blackman drew inspiration from the Star Trek series when costuming for Pushing Daisies, and Lily’s eye patch is the first piece of evidence.

Vivian prefers to dress in an exotic fashion.  Each of her costumes is a variation of chinoiserie, as previously mentioned regarding the mermaid costumes. Vivian’s favorite dress is the qi pao.  This style of dress gained popularity in China during the twentieth century.

Early into its introduction, the qi pao was considered extremely functional and provided women with a large range of movement.  Simple, it is a one-piece gown that closes with toggle buttons on the right shoulder.  Initially it was only worn by the wealthy, but became so fashionable by the 1920s and 1930s that the qi pao became identified as a national dress and a symbol of modernity.[1] The qi pao’s popularity in China peaked in the 1950s, but the Western world still has a level of fascination with this dress.

The World of Suzie Wong, which debuted in 1960, is exemplary of the Western world’s fascination with the eastern fashion and exoticism.  Vivian’s retro qi pao fashions evoke transformation, escapism, and the luxury of the exotic.

Another important character is Olive Snook.  She is a waitress at The Pie Hole, and also Ned’s neighbor.  She desperately loves Ned, but her feelings are unrequited.  Nonetheless, she is cheerful and this is reflected in her 1960s retro fashions.  Olive’s style is centered around two major fashion movements of this decade, particularly the “space-aged retro” that was iconic of the late part of the decade.

The context of Olive’s costume is primarily work related.  Often, she is in her Pie Hole uniform.  The uniform is very similar to the “space age” designs by Pierre Cardin during the late 1960s.  The use of hardware accessories and durable, industrial materials were characteristics of Cardin’s clothing.  He created designs for both men and women, each looking like an androgynous uniform ready for the space age.  Cardin himself spoke about his designs as futuristic:

The clothes that I prefer are those I invent for a life that doesn’t exist yet- the world of tomorrow.[2]

Olive’s uniform is simultaneously retro and futuristic, which poses the question every fashion historian considers:  how do we get back to the future?  The 1960s was the most modern period in fashion history, and designs have never been able to surpass its cutting edge futurism. The machine age dominated the view of the future, offering incredible technology fused with fantasy.  Therefore, a return to the 1960s is not nostalgic, but is a desire for tomorrow and beyond.

Pushing Daisies costume designer Robert Blackman is familiar with this concept.  In the early 1990s, he started designing costumes for Star Trek.  Accustomed to designs and imagery of the future, Blackman has an affinity with Cardin and the Space Age Sixties style.

However, Blackman’s range is not limited to the Sixties futurism and this is evident when Olive is at with friends or at home.  With friends, she wears a variety of ensembles that are Pucci inspired.  Here we see her in a pink psychedelic printed halter dress.  It bears a striking resemblance to many of the Pucci prints that are iconic of the Italian fashion house. 

At home, Olive is more romantic and vulnerable, her house decorated in French toile from floor to ceiling.  She wears floral pajamas when resting, thinking of how much she loves Ned.

Every episode introduces a guest character.  Costumes are very carefully designed to enhance their brief role. One example is Jeanine in the “Dummy” episode. Jeanine is a bulimic promotions model for the automobile company that produces a car named the Dandy Lion SX.  This car runs on dandy lion’s for fuel.

Here we see Jeanine in a white headdress that mimics the wispy dandelion seeds.  She also sports yellow petal eyelashes, similar to the pair seen here from a 1969 photograph in London.

Jeanine’s dress has a high neck, long sleeves, is cinched at the waist.  The hemline falls below the knee, drawing attention to her Courreges style white boots.  The back of the dress dips into a v-shape. As she is promoting a car from the future, her style reflexes the Space Age and Mod movements 1960s as well.

While the Youth Quake of the 1960s rejected couture, today’s culture idolizes it.  Haute couture has been a like phoenix, created, destroyed, and ultimately rising from its ashes.  Recent fashion critics question the survival of couture.  Stacy London, the TV stylist and co-star of What Not to Wear commented in April’s edition of W Magazine:

Television has democratized fashion,’ . . . ‘To not give couture its due is a shame.  But at the same time, how relevant is it in pop culture — particularly to the audiences who are watching these shows?

[3] I disagree with London.

Shows like Pushing Daisies expose viewers to what high fashion is all about.  Blackman’s costumes are custom made for each character, and communicate a distinct personality.  The originality of his costumes and unique color palette attract viewers.  Moreover, Pushing Daisies is a vehicle that is preserving the values of haute couture and fashion.  Blackman’s individual, personalized style is custom designed for each character from the ground up.  The only parallel to his costume design is haute couture.

In the same W article, Simon Doonan, creative director of Barneys New York defines, and defends, the continuing relevance of couture:

The value of the couture comes from the fact that it preserves the notion of craft in fashion. . .  It’s not the fact that it’s a bunch of rich ladies hurling money at the Paris collections.  And it’s not the fact that the misuse of the word is blurring the distinction between a dress from Strawberry that’s $19.99 and one that’s $40,000.  I don’t care about any of that.  Crafts are holy.  I feel exactly the same way about couture as I do about old hippies in Big Sur making tooled leather belts or American Indians making beautiful .blankets.  Exactly the same reverence should be attached to couture.  Not because it’s posh.  Not because it’s expensive.  But because it’s done by hand and it’s a dying art.”[4]

Through strategic theatricality and retro inspired fashion, Pushing Daisies brings back the notion of original fashion created through love.  Blackman utilizes fashion as the creative act of pure self-expression that develops each character – uniting them, their love for one another, their passions, their hobbies into a love that is greater than desire.  The complex and whimsical plot seems irrational at times, but it is love expressed through costume that unites these fanciful individuals.

These elements suggest that there is a higher realm of living, that death is not the finale.  Whether we look to the past or the future, our world is changing at a rapid pace.  How do we adapt?  What rules do we follow?  How will it all end?  With the changes of modern times and hyper-stimulation, fashion – and love – create their own unique set of rules that are not means to an end, but a progression and evolution aiming towards the sublime.    These rules defy death.


[1] Chic China, 157.

[2]Cardin, Pierre.  Past, Present, Future. 1990

[3] W.  April, 2008, 120.

[4] Ibid.


[1] Dummy Episode

[2] Retro.  9

[3] IMDB.com


April 2nd, 2010

Political Agenda: Can Fashion Exist in a Communist Country?

What a genius question . . .

I’d like start with a Clinton-ism, in that “it all depends on what your definition of fashion is”.

(Please roll the clip from his impeachment hearing!)

Sure, fashion can be manufactured by the state, dictated by regional uniform.  But in this sense, fashion is fragmented from its all-encompassing meaning.  Its full power lies dormant, waiting – plotting – for a time at which it can escape and overrule its oppressor.  Fashion never really dies, it just changes form.

Wait!  I learned this concept in physics!  The law of the conservation of matter!  Matter can be neither created or destroyed.  It simply changes forms!  Let’s just substitute matter with fashion:

Fashion can be neither created or destroyed.  It simply changes forms. GENIUS!!!

Dormant Fashion

In terms of constructing individual identity, design creativity, and haute couture – fashion absolutely cannot exist with communism.  Fashion does not belong to the state.  Fashion seeks to create it’s own laws – it simple cannot be controlled by a totalitarian regime.  It instead belongs to a determined, uncontrollable few who’s visions ignite longing and the need to be beautifully dressed.

Former French Vogue editor Bettina Ballard put it so eloquently in her autobiography, In My Fashion:

The fashion world is no place for timid dedicated souls; it is a field for strong, determined egoists who have an innate desire to impose their wills on the world—wills of iron disguised in rustling silks and beautiful colors.

(Thanks, Emily!)

Let’s take a gander at Russian (then) and Cuba (now) and how their communist regimes attempt to control and regulate fashion:

Russia:

Communist Russia opposed ostentatious displays of fashion.  So what did they do to control women’s need for beauty?  First, production of textiles and garments were controlled by the state.  In all reality, there was no choice about what you were going to wear.  The aim of communist fashion design was to eliminate differences in age, body type, and geographical location.  The ideal design must be available for mass production.  This aim was elucidated in Comrade Zamushkin of the Tretyakov Gallery lecture at the College of Applied Arts in Budapest. (Medvedev, 260)

Fashion’s aim, in communist Russia, was to level the playing field.  Everyone would look the same.  So wait, isn’t that a democratization of fashion?  I’m confused, which political platform  are we on?

The first communist fashion shows were held at factories to reach the target clientele: the proletariat.  Workers often modeled the attire in these shows.  Viewers sat at the same height as the models, stressing the idea of communist fashion as a key tool for social leveling. (Ibid)

Advice. Life Magazine shoot.

A plus?  The state mandated that the designers had to take audience feedback from each fashion show.  This information would help the designers create pragmatic, functional clothing for the Russian women.  (Darling, you have it all wrong!  Here, let me help you with that monochromatic, tent-like tunic you’ve designed . . .I have a much better idea.)

The minus?  Well, the women were too scared to really voice their real opinions.

(Wait, if I’m too radical, I’ll be ELIMINATED? On second thought, that tunic is divine!  I’ll take it in the polka dot fabric.  Can you put pockets on it?)

Admirers. Life Magazine shoot.

Christian Dior paid a visit to the Iron Curtain in the 1950s to do a haute couture photo shoot.  Life Magazine covered the action.  Hmm, I’ll bet the ladies went back to the designers and shouted, “Give me Dior or give me death!”  (Or at least they were thinking it, because death was always a possible answer)

In the streets. Life Magazine shoot.

Clearly, everyone was paying attention to Dior’s fashion.  My favorite photos?  The two in which the Parisian models are walking the streets, oblivious to the strident glares.

Glaring. Life Magazine shoot.

Krasivaya. Life Magazine shoot.

Things have changed considerable in Russia now, and young designers are forging the way for a new style.  My favorite?  22 year old Yelizaveta Pankratova.  Check out her video:

Charming, isn’t she?

Russian designers have a unique issue at hand: creating a unique identity, not something inspired by Western iconography of Stalinist Russia – and finding a profitable channel to sell their clothing and distribute their brand.

Cuba:

Cuba’s fashion capital is Santa Clara, and is located right in the middle of the country.  Exuberarte is a recent fashion event that debuts collections from the best Cuban designers.  They even get a chance to sell their lines.  (Hmm, I think I sense capitalism sneaking into the picture.)

While there was not much I would have considered wearing on the site, I was impressed with the fact that there was a fashion show in Cuba.  With a further search, I found a video someone posted of images from the show.  In the video, I saw several interesting pieces that hadn’t appeared on the Exuberarte website.  The show appeared rather successful – in some ways better than some shows put on in the States.

Deeper down the rabbit hole, I found 2 Cuban fashion designers, Guido Asenjo Puebla and Pavel Lopez Alonso, that are selling their collection on the web!  There are some fabulous hand painted dresses I liked.  (Sniff, sniff.  I smell green!)

Cuba fashion by Puebla & Alonso

You can contact them directly for purchase inquiries at their site:

http://www.havana-havana.com/portfolio.html

My favorite Cuban designer? Dionisio Abad Jarrosay Ruiz.  Equally as charming as Yelizaveta Pankratova, Ruiz teaches design students while working on his clothing line.  Inspired by art, sculpture, and Cuban architecture, Ruiz’s clothes have an exciting geometry that was lacking in the aforementioned shows in Santa Clara.  Watch his interview here:

DIONISIO ABAD JARROSAY RUIZ / Dionisio’s interview

Ruiz also designes plastic arts – or accessories, that compliment each piece.

Ruiz design. From Havana-cultura.com.

It’s like an eco-chic 70′s modern glam.  I love it and want it all!

Ruiz design. From Havana-cultura.com.

Cubans decidedly have an entrepreneurial spirit.  They seem to not let communism get in their way of designing fashion.  Just don’t tell Fidel that.

Ruiz design. From Havana-cultura.com.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers